Yes, this is official documentation from the MS Learn course for the Agentic AI Solution Architect certificate
Microslop SharePhont™
I see, they have been continvoucly morging the docs themselves, as per their developer docs
I’m starting to think they aren’t concerned about making their slides even remotely veritable. This one’s barely even combigent!
“Combigent?” Hm, I never heard that word before I moved to Microsoft.
Microsoft 365 is the only Combigent Certified® cloud platform.
Microsoft 36S, I think you’ll find!
Data Flow
Data Flow
Data Flow
The Data must Flow

(Patric Laine)
REVOLVER OCELOT
It’s the Combigent Directive
Data flow
Data flow Data flow
Data flow
The data must flow
It’s flowing. . . it’s flowing!
Saw this article from Microslop the other day about their MDASH copilot model competing with Mythos for bug finding/fixing.
And here’s the image they went with for the flowchart of what the AI does… Complete with overlapping text and the worst layout I’ve ever seen.
Zero humans proofed this.

I know this! This is a slide deck which only makes sense in an interactive way, where the steps are revealed after one another. Probably straight from a presentation.
Don’t attribute bad work to AI which can be done in the same way by an incompetent human.
As someone who’s career depended on presentations for a while:
Never build animations in-slide (unless they are purely aesthetic).
Instead:
Build multiple slides which duplicate the previous and add new boxes with transitions on the slides. Bonus: change the title on each build to cover the key point.
Sure, they take longer to edit. But that leave-behind export to PDF always works.
about their MDASH copilot model
that’s satire, right?

Those are perfectly cromulent words.
It might be combigent, but at least it’s veritable
Combigent is too nice a sounding word to lack any real meaning it needs one.
Combigent (adj.)
Definition: A word that seems like a real word but actually isn’t
It also looks completely plausible for a word. I can see why an AI trained to make plausible-looking images generated it.
Now I’m curious to see what other perfectly English-looking words it comes up with
How dqre you say such mean things about my computer boyfriend you’re just an irrational meanie I bet all the words you used here are fake too!
A classy male driver of a combine?
I guess it’ll be nice to have a spare word lying around for when a wordless meaning emerges
Skilled with the use of a comb
Combigent [kəmˈbʌɪdʒ(ə)nt] {adj} A portmanteau of combine and emergent, describing sth. derived from combination, the ability to combine newly discovered facts or bullshit hallucinated by AI. Examples: The LLM gave a combigent response. The manager’s presentation was quite combigent.
TBF ‘combigent’ should be a word. Not sure I can think of a unique case that justifies it, but it sounds like it could easily be a word.
It sounds like something that would ease the combining of ingredients/components. Like an emulsifier but more general. “An emulsifier is a combigent for oil and water”
Your mom is combigent.
Seems perfectly cromulent to me
The worst is claiming Copilot “understands intent & meaning”, the funny mistakes more or less show that that’s just a blatant lie.
Due to the negative press combigent
Veritable answer? Indubitably!
You missed “Microsoft 36S” and “Intemal Docs”
Yeah those are very weird errors. Not like AI hallucinations. But more like OCR errors.
I wonder if they imported another PowerPoint and then the AI made images out of it to process it. That would be a very inefficient way to do it.
Maybe the AI has had an OCR pass grafted onto its output processing to make it seem more capable of producing text. AI image generation usually makes weird alien looking text, I could imagine someone deciding to add on an automatic cleanup step to try to make it less obviously AI.
For years, I’ve rather read Stackoverflow comments than Microsoft’s nearly unusable documentation. It’s as if they don’t know how to write coherently
DOS 5 docko was fine. I wonder* when they went wrong
*I don’t really
Oh, yes. Good question. I can’t speak for those days. I’m largely speaking largely about the Azure related documentation over the past 5 years or so
Then they train their troubleshooting clanker on said unusuable documentation so it’s unhelpful but it won’t let you talk to a human who might actually be able to assist you.


















