ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agoWhich is it Lemmy?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square281linkfedilinkarrow-up1439arrow-down116file-text
arrow-up1423arrow-down1imageWhich is it Lemmy?lemmy.worldThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square281linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTotallynotJessica@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up127arrow-down2·1 month agoYou can’t place a portal on a moving surface in either game, so neither.
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up77·1 month agoyou can in one specific spot in portal 2!
minus-squareSonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up50·1 month agoTwo, if you count… the big one at the end
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up18·1 month agoit doesn’t look like it’s moving though. and considering how many things in portal 2 move when they look stationary or vice versa…
minus-squareSonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 month agoAs far as the game engine is concerned, “stationary” is relative to the… other comparatively big thing: the former big thing is moving very quickly around the latter, even if it looks stationary because it has a lower angular velocity
minus-squareMika@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoSo now we just need to build this test in there and we are set
minus-squareThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up26·1 month agoSo the cube is just smashed? It’s a practical answer which is slightly upsetting because I wanted more discourse.
minus-squarekkj@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 month agoNo, cubes cannot be destroyed by crushing. The portal disappears when the surface starts moving and then the cube stops the surface’s descent.
minus-squareviertesauge@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·1 month agowhat about the portal on the moon?
minus-square∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 month agoWell, everything is moving or not moving, relatively
minus-squarejoelfromaus@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·30 days agoSomeone should write a thesis on it (or whatever it’s called). Could call it something like The Relativity Theory.
minus-squarealsimoneau@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoIt’s unstable and will dissipate on its own when the relative displacement between them will be too great.
minus-squarerethnor@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoYou’d make a horrible scientist.
minus-squareTotallynotJessica@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoIt said ragebait answers only ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ If it is a question of real life physics, then B would be correct
minus-squarekkj@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoScientists know when to use existing knowledge.
You can’t place a portal on a moving surface in either game, so neither.
you can in one specific spot in portal 2!
Two, if you count… the big one at the end
it doesn’t look like it’s moving though. and considering how many things in portal 2 move when they look stationary or vice versa…
As far as the game engine is concerned, “stationary” is relative to the… other comparatively big thing: the former big thing is moving very quickly around the latter, even if it looks stationary because it has a lower angular velocity
pretty obvious tbh
So now we just need to build this test in there and we are set
So the cube is just smashed?
It’s a practical answer which is slightly upsetting because I wanted more discourse.
No, cubes cannot be destroyed by crushing. The portal disappears when the surface starts moving and then the cube stops the surface’s descent.
what about the portal on the moon?
Well, everything is moving or not moving, relatively
Someone should write a thesis on it (or whatever it’s called). Could call it something like The Relativity Theory.
It’s unstable and will dissipate on its own when the relative displacement between them will be too great.
Skill issue
You’d make a horrible scientist.
It said ragebait answers only ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
If it is a question of real life physics, then B would be correct
Damnit, you are correct, my bad.
Scientists know when to use existing knowledge.