• Dozzi92@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I got snipped so my wife didn’t have to do the hormonal bullshit. Her doctor is putting her back in it because women’s bodies literally do not want them to be happy.

  • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Weird how it seems like it’s all for women and safe sex but then criticizes a tool women have to checks notes take control of their sex lives and make decisions about getting pregnant.

    • medgremlin@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Non-surgical birth control options for women tend to come with a lot of side effects and a number of risks that don’t always outweigh the benefit. Hormonal birth control can cause tons of problems for the women taking them and some of them are associated with life-threatening side effects like increased risk of clotting leading to DVTs, PEs, and strokes.

      • kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes, and male birth control doesn’t solve these problems because the only way to be 100% sure is to be on birth control yourself, especially important with huge chunks of the US banning abortions

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I not sure I can impregnate 9 women in a day but I’m willing to participate in a scientific study to find out if anyone is doing that.

  • village604@adultswim.fan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s because hormonal birth control for women takes advantage of existing biological processes to prevent pregnancy.

    Men don’t have any known biological processes that can be utilized like that, although it’s been consistently studied for decades.

    • DaGeek247@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I had thought that another part of it was the levels of harm compared to the problem; getting pregnant is incredibly stressful and possibly harmful, up to and including death as a possibility. A medicine that can stop that but has side affects that are less harmful than pregnancy is a lot more palatable. Whereas, for men, the harm caused by pregnancy is zero, so any harm caused by the pill is weighed a lot heavier.

  • wampus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Nah, this isn’t a great point at all… even at face value really.

    Put slightly differently, if we’re assuming people sleep around as much as the text implies, if we focus on birth control solely for men, then one ‘failure’/non-controlled man would result in a ton of pregnancies. If the onus is on women, then one ‘failure’/non-controlled woman would result in one pregnancy.

  • REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    How does this unscientific instagram vomit has 500 votes on lemmy? Are we turning into reddit?

  • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The most commonly produced, available, and used birth control method worldwide is the latex condom, used by everyone who has a penis. Try again.

  • curiousaur@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is just logically wrong.

    If birth control was only made for men, and 90% of men were on birth control, you could end up with far more pregnancies than if it’s for women and 90% of women were on it.

    The conclusion is exactly the opposite of the argument.

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t understand you logic. Are you saying the remaining 10% of men would impregnate a disproportionate amount of women?

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yes. Because 10% of men is enough to impregnate all the women.

        As a guy though, I wish there was male birth control. I do not love that women get to decide if they are going to make me a father or not.

        • Sadbutdru@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I mean there’s condoms, and there’s not ejaculating inside women. If you don’t want the risk of being a father, those are things you can control.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Nice try mr. pervert, you were trying to make me think about a woman nine months pregnant getting plowed nine times in a row.

  • angrystego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s the woman who’d get pregnant and who doesn’t want to. Should she rely on whether the men took their pills correctly? Taking hormones sucks for many women, but they’re happy to be able to have birth control in their hands.

    • Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yeah, I think people forget why the pill was such a game changer: It allowed women, without the permission or knowledge of their husband/sexual partner, to decide whether or not they wanted to get pregnant.

      • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Should there be an temporary contraceptive for men? Yes, it gives agency to men and also provides an alternative to women who can’t use female contraception for a multitude of reasons.

        Will that be preferred by all women? Hell no

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m not sure who’s she targeting because I know a lot of guys who would love to have birth control pills.

    • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      and no sane woman should believe that, because if she will later find the guy was lying, it is not going to be the guy having to deal with the consequences. so it is quite stupid take.