Godric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 8 天前Finally an explanationlemmy.worldimagemessage-square280linkfedilinkarrow-up1856arrow-down143
arrow-up1813arrow-down1imageFinally an explanationlemmy.worldGodric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 8 天前message-square280linkfedilink
minus-squarejamesrandysghost@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down2·7 天前Tolerance paradox in action!
minus-squareHonytawk@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down4·7 天前The tolerance paradox does not exist. See BeardedSquidwards comment.
minus-squarewpb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·7 天前I don’t see it. How does a society tolerating the intolerant not enable them to be intolerant, even if you believe in social contract theory?
minus-squarejamesrandysghost@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·6 天前I think you need to re-read the comment…
minus-squareBeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up13·7 天前I remember being told it makes more sense when you realize it’s a part of the social contract. Breaching it prevents you from taking part in it.
minus-squareHonytawk@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·7 天前Indeed. If one side breaks the contract, the other isn’t bound by it anymore either.
Tolerance paradox in action!
The tolerance paradox does not exist. See BeardedSquidwards comment.
I don’t see it. How does a society tolerating the intolerant not enable them to be intolerant, even if you believe in social contract theory?
I think you need to re-read the comment…
I remember being told it makes more sense when you realize it’s a part of the social contract. Breaching it prevents you from taking part in it.
Indeed. If one side breaks the contract, the other isn’t bound by it anymore either.