• db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    This post is for paid members only

    Become a paid member for unlimited ad-free access to articles, bonus podcast content, and more.

    No.

  • Amelia42@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    4 days ago

    And the speech was given to graduating students from the College of Arts and Humanities and the School of Communication and Media.

    Possibly the worst audience to stand in front of and praise the ‘revolution’ of AI

    • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      4 days ago

      I thought she was out of touch with reality but this sounds more like stupidity as well.

      Grads: “We just got art degrees”

      Speaker: “AI can create art that replaces artists”

      Grads: “boooo”

      Speaker: “why are the booing”

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 days ago

        AI Spokesmodel: “We built a big machine that steals your work product to plagiarize it, then sucks you into an assembly-level job that pays under-subsistence wages to tidy up all the crap it injects”

        Journeymen Professionals: “This sucks! Smash the looms!”

        AI Spokesmodel: “Don’t worry, though. Some of you can still become cops!”

        Austrian Art School Dropouts: “We’re listening”.

  • ChromaticMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    5 days ago

    How can she be surprised? “Hey, here is this thing we’re building that we hope makes 90% of you obsolete!”, sounds like a great perspective for the future.

    • Flagstaff@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It’s not gonna make them obsolete. It’s gonna keep piling on technical debt from bad practices of which it’s entirely unaware (not that it’s ever “aware” of anything) while tricking dumb upper management, C-suite, and investors into thinking that it can render so many people obsolete, before it all crashes. “Pride comes before the fall.”

      Proof: the layoffs are failing to generate improved returns https://toast.ooo/post/13892904

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s not going to replace artists, though. It will replace art made by committee, or art made for the balloon aisle at Walmart.

      The artists that sold their soul for corporate Hollywood deserve this. They were making slop before the AI ever appeared.

  • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Honestly, she isn’t wrong.
    However, the Industrial Revolution was a step forward, the AI revolution is most likely a great filter event. Industrialized Stupidity at Scale; Buliding giant data centers and turbo-charging climate change so some billionaires can race to see who can be the first trillionaire

    Edit: I think a lot of you skimmed what I wrote and didn’t actually READ it. Yes AI bad, I agree.

    And those saying the Industrial Revolution was bad (it was, to a group. But you would not be bitching on the Internet without it.)

    We can agree not everything is 100% good/bad right? Like yes, the Industrial Revolution was bad for the workers at the time, but at the same time, you wouldn’t have the phone in your hand without it. You wouldn’t have the computer on your desk without it. Hell you probably wouldn’t have your bicycle/car whatever without it.

    Luckily with the “AI revolution” we’ll all probably die from the Climate Change, World War 3 and world wide Economic collapse before we get to an equilibrium point.

    • Muffi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      For the working class, the industrial revolution was not a step forward. It took a lot of time, hard union work and political regulation to wrangle the beast that was the industrial revolution.

      • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        And it’s the thing responsible for the climate change. It bring wonderful things, but may make the world unlivable for humans so… I won’t call it an unambiguous step.forward.

        • architect@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s going to happen anyway. We’ll follow instinct, same as everything else. We’re programmed to consume, expand, decay, and pass the entropy along.

          Probably the only thing we can do about this is bring the population down to a very small number. You will never convince a large percentage of people to care, ever, and when it comes to the existential threat of climate change you can’t wait for them to change their minds.

          This isn’t me saying we can’t do anything about it. This is me saying we won’t because of what that cost would be.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      Honestly, she isn’t wrong.

      AI Slop is a sub-optimal replacement that requires enormous amounts of materials and second-order human labor to produce. Like so many other industrial innovations, it’s a waste-production machine that has the added benefit of occasionally producing consumables.

      We get to run the AI Slop machine at a profit because the market for slop is heavily monopolized and the consumer base is cash rich and alienated from its laboring peers. But a downturn in the domestic economy, a sudden shortfall in cheap raw materials, a major shift in popular consumption habits, or a higher quality alternative at a lower price point all put AI slop at risk of losing profitability.

      It’s a far more fragile industry than any Slop Advocate wants to admit. And it needs an enormous structural investment to function.

      the Industrial Revolution was a step forward

      A step forward into what, though? Mass overproduction resulting in economy-wide enshitification and a crisis of excess waste all carried enormous tail costs.

      Are you really better off today buying furniture from IKEA that won’t last ten years, rather than inheriting antiques from your parents that have endured for the last century? Are you better of driving a car built in a big machine-factory than riding a trolley that was designed custom for the city lines? Are you better of eating individually plastic-wrapped slices of fake cheese than carving a chunk off the giant wheel in your pantry?

      Idk, man. Views differ on that one.

      • Womble@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Are you really better off today buying furniture from IKEA that won’t last ten years, rather than inheriting antiques from your parents that have endured for the last century?

        Most people dont have the choice of inheriting pieces of furnitute with a value of months worth of wages when they first get a home of their own.

        Are you better of driving a car built in a big machine-factory than riding a trolley that was designed custom for the city lines?

        Do you think trolly buses are a pre-industrial thing, with their electric powered engines running on steel rails through dense urban areas?

        • yessikg@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Trolly buses are older than the industrial revolution, they just used horses instead

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      But are we producing things more than 10 folds with the same quality?

      Cause what I’ve seen is producing worse quality at a higher cost (which is subsidized).

    • DisasterTransport@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Without the industrial revolution I wouldn’t even exist; setting aside the butterfly effect of my parents never having met because they’re from different parts of the country for a moment I owe my existence to modern medicine, which would not exist without industrialization.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 days ago

    The last industrial revolution turned farmers into factory drones. This one will turn tech workers into homeless gig slaves.

  • Aniki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    how is this worth a post?

    my cat says she wants another snack