There was a study on judges and parole hearings, and early in their shift they were much more likely to grant parole, and the closer it got to lunch time, the less likely they would grant parole.
After lunch, they were again much more likely to grant parole, but as the day wears on they are more and more strict.
Consider this an anecdote I am not going to track down the study to prove the great debate or anything I’m tired
There was a study on judges and parole hearings, and early in their shift they were much more likely to grant parole, and the closer it got to lunch time, the less likely they would grant parole.
After lunch, they were again much more likely to grant parole, but as the day wears on they are more and more strict.
Consider this an anecdote I am not going to track down the study to prove the great debate or anything I’m tired
That’s been debunked. Or rather, it’s never been replicated.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/myth-hungry-judge-cautionary-tale-legal-psychology-robert-nogacki-yttwf
Who knew? That’s what I get for believing the National Academy of Sciences! Thank you for correction.
I was going to argue with you for weeks for daring to challenge my claim, but then I remembered I am tired
I bet you could also see that theory in action by plotting how hostile a lammy users comments are over the span of a day haha