Labfox's Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish ·
edit-2
13 hours ago

When your phone has a menu that NO user in the UNIVERSE would ever have any reason to touch but then you get to 🥵

piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone

message-square
55
link
fedilink
388

When your phone has a menu that NO user in the UNIVERSE would ever have any reason to touch but then you get to 🥵

piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone

printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish ·
edit-2
13 hours ago
message-square
55
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    https://i.imgur.com/ee11bKx.png

    44 comments as I open the thread

    https://i.imgur.com/bbJkJPj.png

    4 options to disable

    AUGH!!! IT’S A CONSPIRACY!!!

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Somebody just knocked on my door. I’m arming myself. Right now. 🔪

      • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Are you arming your… forearms? FOREarms??? hahahHAHahaHAHAAAAHAHahaaaaHAHAAa!!!1!1!111eleventy

        ;-)

  • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’ve never looked at this list before. Quite a large number of them. Is there any way for me to know which ones I shouldn’t have enabled?

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Without having any specialized knowledge on the subject, I’d say, start frequenting cyber security forums, follow youtubers who cover such topics and just keep yourself up to date on matters cyber. Or start researching the CAs one by one.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Thank is for the reminder.

  • meejle@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If anyone else here uses AdGuard, the latest version of their app rejects the affected certificates. 👍

  • goatinspace@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

  • iuminou@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    4

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      XPrQrxdU1gtfyHy.jpg

      • iuminou@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        4

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Well, the post is exactly about the 4, so… yes.

  • micgerne@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    13 hours ago

    there’s 4 of them, coincidence or conspiracy?

    • klankin@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Thats just how they remembered their private key

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Well now you’ve put me on a list. Thanks.

  • exdor@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Shouldnt you also disable the “Comodo” ones?

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Pray tell 🤔

      • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        they were/are a shittier-than-average CA that got famously hacked in 2011 and less famously other times; later they bizarrely tried to trademark the name “Lets Encrypt” (after the real Lets Encrypt already existed). Since 2022 they’re called “Xcitium” and “Sectigo”.

        • Kojichan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I remember thay Lets Encrypt fiasco. Certainly made it hard to figure out the right LE cert when installing onto client websites.

        • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Holy crap, that is some valuable insight! Thanks! :D

  • state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I once tried to disable all but the ones I actually need. There are close to 200 CAs trusted by my devices and I only need to trust about 15 of them. But it’s a colossal pain in the ass to figure out which CA an app needs, so I abandoned that experiment.

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah, I too had that ambition once, but I didn’t even know where to begin, since I don’t know how to find out which once my apps, websites and other services actually need. Other than investigating whole chains of collaboration between the various owners and devs of those services. Arduous much? 😅

      • state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I used a proxy to look up which servers the app was trying to talk to, looked up the cert from the server and which CA I needed. It was very arduous, especially when you installed a new app and just wanted to use it, e.g. for parking. This made me stop doing this. When giving talks to junior devs I used to explain that security and convenience are almost always on opposite sites and you need to figure out where between the two extremes you want to sit. In this case I opted for convenience.

      • Hedup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Arduous much?

        Sounds like a job for a machine.

        • locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Oh stop. You’ll never get this corner of the internet to admit such things.

        • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Careful! They’re gonna whoop our asses: EbEE4QI3SrSHZKV.jpg

  • SteveTech@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    FYI, G3 is the only one listed with the issue, the others are fine AFAIK. But if you don’t trust eMudhra at all after that, then that’s fair.

    Edit: Actually it’s the intermediate certs that are compromised, the roots are still fine, but many of them come from the G3 root cert (and Sectigo’s AAA Certificate Services)

    Source: https://emudhra.we-have-a-problem.com/

    • who@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Excerpt from that page, for Android:

      • eMudhra Technologies Limited: emSign ECC Root CA - G3
      • Comodo CA Limited: AAA Certificate Services

      Of course, people using an Android variant that still gets regular updates are unlikely to need manual disables, since an update will take care of it.

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Oh, thanks for that! 😊 I just heard that they quit the TLS business all together.

      • SteveTech@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yeah, my understanding was they’re not issuing new certificates, but the current ones are still valid until they’ve expired.

        • slazer2au@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Recently learned that root CA don’t actually expire. Yes, they have an expiration date, but nothing pays attention to it for a CA.

          • SteveTech@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Well you can’t sign new certs (with the current date) with an expired root/intermediate cert, but the root/intermediate cert expiring doesn’t strictly invalidate the already signed certs.

            But I was more talking about the end-user certificates in the previous comment.

    • redjard@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They closed shop entirely, so there won’t be any new certs signed anyway

  • halendos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Thanks for reminding me to do that!

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      No problem! But as I told another person, I’m only doing this because I’m not updating my phone anymore, because One UI 8 and above have disabled unlocking of the bootloader. If you’re not rooted and you are still receiving updates from the vendor and Google, then I can’t imagine this being useful.

  • zwerg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Why isn’t this a change pushed by Google?

    • SteveTech@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Because these are root certs which are still fine, it’s the intermediate certs that are compromised.

      I still disabled eMudhra’s emSign G3 anyway, but that’s probably why Google hasn’t disabled the ones shown.

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Is it not? I have no idea. My device isn’t legitimate in their eyes. 😅 (Rooted.)

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah, no need to trust them with this.
        I got a notification that comes after an update, showing new features, which was a day after looking at these memes.
        And I still had the G3 enabled.

  • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Where did you find that?

    • hayvan@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      12 hours ago

      On Android:

      Security and privacy -> more security settings -> view certificates

      Or go to settings and serach of certificates in the search bar

      • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Thanks! How was this not widely spread on day 1? Why wasn’t it pushed as an ota update to deactivate them?

        • hayvan@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          12 hours ago

          eMudhra invalidated their insecure certificates and released renewed ones as far as I know.

          • RustySharp@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            35
            ·
            11 hours ago

            The new ones are 10 times more secure.

            The key is now “40”

            • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 hours ago

              There it is again. You’re shining today. 🤣

              • RustySharp@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Just like my phone. Dark mode is only available for Android 10 onwards.

                • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  39 minutes ago

                  Great last one before bed 😂🩷 but fr you BELOW Android 10? 😱

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Thanks, found it

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Settings - Security and privacy - More security settings - View security certificates

      Mind you, I’m using an outdated Android 15 with a similarly outdated One UI 7. I hope that either AOSP or Samsung already have patched emudhra out of the latest releases? I’m only doing this because I’m not updating my phone anymore, because One UI 8 and above have disabled unlocking of the bootloader.

      • SillyDude@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        12 hours ago

        outdated Android 15 with a similarly outdated One UI 7

        …outdated @ 15 w/ 7?

        • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Good God WHAT are you running 😂😂😂

          • SillyDude@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Uhhh, well on my most up to date device its at least a double digit android version.

            • RustySharp@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              12 hours ago

              8.0 is double digit, right?

              • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 hours ago

                I needed this comment. Thanks. 😂

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        NOpe.

        Just got an Android update ~ half a day ago.
        Just checked the certs, all were there and enabled.

        And this is stock Android.

Programmer Humor@programming.dev

programmer_humor@programming.dev

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !programmer_humor@programming.dev

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

  • Keep content in english
  • No advertisements
  • Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
    • If the mod doesn’t find it funny, you’re banned. Ha-ha!.. For real: do not use the community for “statements”. There are other places for such content. Keep it chill and funny.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.95K users / day
  • 5.46K users / week
  • 8.7K users / month
  • 16.3K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 33.8K subscribers
  • 1.5K Posts
  • 29.7K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • adr1an@programming.dev
  • Feyter@programming.dev
  • BurningTurtle@programming.dev
  • Pierre-Yves Lapersonne@programming.dev
  • UI: unknown version
  • BE: 0.19.19
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org