• III@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I will add that making this image without using AI would be considered low effort. Still, less effort than using AI and would result in better quality than this.

    • III@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      What, you haven’t heard the old slogan “everything’s bigger in Maine”?

      • ghost_laptop@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 minutes ago

        this kind of shit ppl say about latam countries is dumb af tbh. yes, all of latam was formed as settler colonies but why on earth would you want to balkanize global south countries? if anything, and it’s what we latinos been wanting to do, we should unite and build la patria grande. in the majority of cases we do not care that there are a ton of different ethnic groups, we rather unite. this is not to say certain groups shouldn’t receive more autonomy or even their own governance over their land, but it would be the equivalent to balkanize china because they have different ethnic groups.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        A bit more gray area. The answer is yes, but the fundamental process of settler-colonialism in Mexico led to the majority of the population becoming mixed. Indigenous groups like in Chiapas still fight for sovereignty, but it isn’t the same as the US and Canada, where indigenous peoples were shut out, killed, and stripped from their land the same way.

        Ultimately, it’s a topic I have not studied enough to have a definitive answer to, like the US and Canada. The process of decolonization in Mexico will look pretty different from the US and Canada.

  • folaht@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I won’t accept this until Florida becomes part of Mexico and there will be at least one First Nations country.

  • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Would love to see it, but Texas is going to want independence (there’s just too much ego on the subject in that state). And the centre bit of “South Canada” (Wyoming, Nebraska etc) is chock full of MAGAts. They’re not joining.

    South Canada might be Washington state and maybe Oregon Idaho and Nevada. New England would probably want to stand alone but some might fold into Canada - Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire might prefer Canada to getting sucked into a NYC controlled nexus.

    Dunno if Canada would want NYC - too many people - would very much unbalance the power balances, more likely NYC picks up the rest of New England. California would be a good cultural match but like Texas I suspect they’ll want to go alone (and are a good chance of grabbing the rest of “Cascadia”)

    Leaving a diagonal stripe of the pictured US plus the irredeemable rednecks in the central zone as the rump USA

    Anyway, semi serious response to a joke, so yeah I get it, wasn’t meant to be taken seriously, but there is a really high probability of the US breaking apart in the next decade or so.