Because erowid does not meet the definition of a resource.

I never claimed it did. I already asked you once to show me where I said it did.

You are uninformed about what science is. You refuse to acknowledge my definition.

I haven’t even made a comment about your definition because it doesn’t have to do with anything I said. I accept your definition.

You know literally nothing about my research capabilities. Maybe I’m terrible at research but you wouldnt know one way or the other.

I know that you have made multiple claims that erowid is

personal experiences of drug users

Despite multiple links showing that it also has other things.

It even has a collection of resources on the topic at hand. A collection that you claimed did not exist, prompting this whole conversation.

This is pretty compelling evidence that you are unwilling or unable to change your incorrect thoughts on something that is both obvious and objective.

I literally can’t think of a worse trait in a “scientist”

EDIT: I guess being deliberately misleading is worse, but I am giving you the benefit of the doubt that you are just bad, not malicious.