OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoChoose wiselylemmy.worldimagemessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up1126arrow-down114
arrow-up1112arrow-down1imageChoose wiselylemmy.worldOriginEnergySux@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square15linkfedilink
minus-squaregegil@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 day agoYou can have penis without balls, but you cant have balls without penis
minus-squareHertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·16 hours agoI’ll disagree, source: friend of mine had balls installed a year or two ago.
minus-squarexkbx@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·23 hours agoI don’t know if the question should be the absence of, but which would you attribute beautiful and which underwhelming. Would you prefer an underwhelming penis with beautiful balls, or a beautiful penis with underwhelming balls?
minus-squareKoboldCoterie@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day agoThat sounds like a challenge.
You can have penis without balls, but you cant have balls without penis
I’ll disagree, source: friend of mine had balls installed a year or two ago.
This is wise
I don’t know if the question should be the absence of, but which would you attribute beautiful and which underwhelming. Would you prefer an underwhelming penis with beautiful balls, or a beautiful penis with underwhelming balls?
i will prefer penis in both cases
That sounds like a challenge.