The Creator; righteousness; honest and empathetic approaches to the world and divine revelation. Assume you’ll meet the benevolent Creator after you die and that you’ll be judged for your actions and the rest will follow, unless you’re dishonest. 👍
You answered one of my questions - the first one. The rest is vague religious nonsensical non-answers. Which is funny, if a bit hypocritical, when you emphasize the importance of honesty.
I’m not, it’s just not something you understand. I meant Abrahamic monotheism, but that’s just because that’s the most complete uhh “understanding”. It’s not vague, it’s slightly debatable but it’s not open ended, and if we sat down and thought about God even without this Abrahamic background I’m sure we’d reach the same conclusions (unless we’re sociopaths trying to make excuses for ourselves). 🤷
You misunderstand me. It is my stance on theistic belief that if you cannot honestly answer the sequence of questions I asked, or if the answers conform to known grifter patterns, then the belief in question is complete falsehood not to be taken seriously.
So you can give all the excuses you want and wave your hands around like a Jedi but you have utterly failed the most basic first-line test for defending against charlatans. Goodbye.
The Creator; righteousness; honest and empathetic approaches to the world and divine revelation. Assume you’ll meet the benevolent Creator after you die and that you’ll be judged for your actions and the rest will follow, unless you’re dishonest. 👍
You answered one of my questions - the first one. The rest is vague religious nonsensical non-answers. Which is funny, if a bit hypocritical, when you emphasize the importance of honesty.
I’m not, it’s just not something you understand. I meant Abrahamic monotheism, but that’s just because that’s the most complete uhh “understanding”. It’s not vague, it’s slightly debatable but it’s not open ended, and if we sat down and thought about God even without this Abrahamic background I’m sure we’d reach the same conclusions (unless we’re sociopaths trying to make excuses for ourselves). 🤷
You misunderstand me. It is my stance on theistic belief that if you cannot honestly answer the sequence of questions I asked, or if the answers conform to known grifter patterns, then the belief in question is complete falsehood not to be taken seriously.
So you can give all the excuses you want and wave your hands around like a Jedi but you have utterly failed the most basic first-line test for defending against charlatans. Goodbye.
Fair enough, Sarah. Maybe on a different day I’ll be able to provide a more comprehensive answer. Take care. 👋