• TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Because, it’s NEVER been about protecting kids, or other vulnerable people. The filthy rich don’t give one flying fuck about vulnerable people.

  • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Time to spread vids of Cook and Pichai 69ing

    this was as close as I could get without burning too many rainforests–maybe people with better AI skillz can get an actual image of them fucking

  • OldGrayDog@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If you want to get it banned, make some deepfake porn of them and their family members and watch how fast it disappears.

  • BanMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been an Apple user since the 80s, I used to be penpals with their CFO Ellen Hancock. Would get care packages from their PR team full of promo items. Exchanged emails with Wozniak and Jobs. I was deeply obsessed.

    Obviously things have drifted away from the core “underdog” vibe that Apple exemplified for so long, as their popularity and device adoption surged, they’ve been less of the Apple I knew.

    But Cook’s behavior this year has me realizing I’ve bought my last Apple device. Bring on Linux in every form.

    I know I don’t matter at all, but it would have taken epic amounts of bullshit to make me sour on them, and here we are.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I recently saw a video about what changed and it’s very clear that it is almost entirely Tim Cook’s fault. He’s a rotten snake who no one ever seemed to really like and who was constantly wrong about nearly everything and yet was left in charge and, with zero surprise whatsoever, immediately and consistently fucked it all up.

      He was handed a roadmap to making money without sacrificing quality or much integrity(corporations seem hell-bent on making sure they always suck a little bit at the very least) and he threw it away to be a little bitch instead.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          48 minutes ago

          I’ve completely lost the video, sorry.

          It talked about how he has always been far more obssessed with shareholder value than quality and affordability for the customer.

          Apple used to make products that got cheaper over time but under Cook they’ve been sky-rocketing in price.

          It also talked about how he was so concerned with pennies that he sought to put a stranglehold on the design team, the people who came up with the entire aesthetic that is Apple a huge reason why they’ve sold so well.

          I’ve no clue why he was chosen to lead the company because he’s just a massive idiot who was handed an easy win, hell he was handed something that had already won and has done so much to break what he was given.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Your individual change is a drop in the ocean but everyone making that change is a tidal wave. I have very recently moved to linux after almost 30 years using windows. It is an incredible set of OSs with brilliant support from a fantastic community and it keeps getting better.

      We need to make the change and encourage others too.

      • bdama@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        24 hours ago

        You’re not alone. Used to be the biggest Apple fan, worked there for nearly ten years until 2023.

        Last year I made the cut, the new PC I bought was custom built and is running Linux. My MacBook Air is running Asahi Fedora Remix primarily and the iPhone was sold on. Disconnecting from iCloud was a pain, getting pictures off of their system took me three months but it was worth it. Self hosting my stuff now and 2026 is the year to switch my family and friends over as well.

        • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I used Apple with an Apple 2, then once bought an Apple laptop just before they switched to intel cpus as an experiment. For reference I had already been running Linux for years at the time, so that was a test. It lasted three or four months before I ran back to Kde, couldn’t stand how rigid, awkward and closed the interface was. As an aside, it was pretty much impossible to extract my data from their “photos” app. They renamed everything and dumed it in a maze of illegible directories.
          That was my last contact with Apple.

          Even Microsoft felt more user friendly to me.

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Just finishing off setting up ElementaryOS on my wife’s early 2015 MacBook Air. It’s based on Ubuntu LTS, but with a custom theme to make it macOS-esque. Seems pretty good so far, but time will tell if she enjoys using it.

      Edit: Everything but the webcam just worked out of the box. The webcam was a motherfuck though. Took the better part of 3hrs trawling forums to find the full instructions for installing the kernel module to get it running…

  • Tamps@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    It appears to demonstrate that it’s very much profit over principles and values.

    • TeddE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      No, I don’t think that’s what’s happening here. I think people are theorizing that X is very likely to respond to pressure from Google and Apple threatening to deplatform them, and loudly complaining about them not applying their own rules equally is a great way to remind their internal lawyers to put pressure on them (insulting the CEOs is just a nice bonus).

      Frankly, if the fallot here is a relaxed adult policy, that’s still a win. LGBTQIA advocacy groups tend to get lumped in as ‘adult’, which is a problem for trans-affirming suicide prevention hotlines trying to save lives.

      As for your slippery slope question, that Pandora’s box is already open. Just half a year ago Mastercard and VISA put the strongarm on Valve and itch.io to let the payment processors ban any game they choose under the guise of pornography censorship. Pressuring a platform to censure an app ‘for the sake of the children’ just isn’t the virgin ground you seem to think it is.

    • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      There is another battle: There is a fight to open up app installation on phones. The EU recently forced Apple to allow other app stores on iOS and Apple is fighting this as hard as you would expect. Apple & Google are taking 30% of each sale in their stores and are making bank. One of the arguments they are pushing is “safety”. Only apps on their vetted app stores are safe, every other store is unsafe and so on. If they allow a child porn app in their store, all of their arguments in this debate are invalid. And that is also an important fact for that debate.

  • DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Sometimes I have the impression X is doing everything to be removed to the App Store so Musk can sue and get rid of the guidelines. And as we can see here we can do even CSAM on his social network and no one do anything, this should be a matter of law, not a private company like Google or Apple.

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean Grok is literally being used to make CSAM so it should not only be taken down but the law should get involved in any reasonable country.

    • QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      It’s just crazy dude. Give pedos an opportunity, and they WILL take advantage of it. You could be making an image hosting app for frickin octogenarians and they’ll somehow discover it and use it as their spank bank. I hate that shit.

    • bearboiblake@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      how many times do we have to say it

      the law is optional for corporations and the rich

      the law is for oppressing the poor and justifying it

    • Bunbury@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      The thing is though… is it actually CSM according to the law if there is no real child involved along the way? At least some countries might need a law change first before tackling this.

      Edit: I checked the local law where I’m located and it’s “images or videos depicting a minor during a sexual act”. I’d argue these AI generated images aren’t of minors because they don’t exist. We probably need new laws first unless it’s provable that the images represent a specific real life minor.

      • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        The thing is though… is it actually CSM according to the law if there is no real child involved along the way?

        Legally, yes. The law in the UK also includes images of children that are drawn or computer generated.

        • k0e3@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I had kind of assumed this was the case in a lot of countries with one of the more prominent exception being Japan (we have a lot of fucked up manga/anime).

        • Bunbury@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Good. I also read a bit more into it and while I’m not located in the UK apparently there is a specific extension to the law that also includes drawings and “collage” type edits. It doesn’t mention AI yet but surely this should count.

          RIP my search history. But I’m glad we don’t need to wait for the law to catch up (in some places). Now all we have to do is scream from the rooftops that the laws need to be applied. Or even better: sue someone.

    • Signtist@bookwyr.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Coward” implies that they want to do good, but are too scared to do so. There’s no reason to think that, and indeed we shouldn’t. They want money and Elon makes them money; that’s all there is to it. If ethics mattered to them at all, they wouldn’t have been able to climb to the position of CEO of a major corporation in the first place.

  • pleaseletmein@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    2 days ago

    They pulled Tumblr over cartoon porn, but using AI to sexually abuse actual women and children is all good, apparently.

  • sigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    167
    ·
    2 days ago

    this is actually a pretty wild headline to appear on the verge frontpage

    good on them

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      2 days ago

      I see a lot of people hate The Verge and I don’t understand why. Is it perfect? No. But, I think they have a pretty solid ethics policy and they call out bullshit.

      I like 404 better but Verge is by no means bad.

      Maybe there was an issue with them that I don’t know about? Idk!

      • miss phant@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 days ago

        An eon ago they made a PC building guide that was riddled with mistakes and had to pull it down again and I think that’s still where most of that comes from.

        • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          2 days ago

          IIRC the initial response to extremely valid criticism of the video was also terrible, and they threw the video host under the bus for a rushed video that should’ve never been produced under the circumstances it was (granted he was part of the terrible response to criticism)

        • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah. I just looked it up. That video was dumb and bad. Shouldn’t have made it up, but the article is still on their site. They did issue a retraction and update the story to correct the inaccuracies.

          I don’t know if it warrants the Lemmy hate but I also know that Lemmy hates anything corporate so it is what it is. I’ll still read The Verge as long as they follow their own ethics policy.

        • JayGray91🐉🍕@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          It goes earlier than that debacle for me but I honestly do not remember anymore.

          If they’ve turned a new leaf then hey good for them.

      • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Paywalls mostly (speaking for myself).

        That and, back in the day, they trashed Samsung for making big phones, then praised Apple for making objectively less functional ones (no stylus, no Note like features). We started calling them iVerge back then, for favoritism to Apple. Even as an Apple guy, I found it annoying.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Google “verge pc build”. They ran a video of a guy, completely unqualified, building a “$2000 PC”, and doing almost everything wrong. And then the guy called people racists for dunking on him. There’s layers to the story. The Verge has been a joke of tech reporting for years.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          And “completely unqualified” in this case means a motivated 12 year old with an Internet connection would do significantly better.

        • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Found it. Yeah that video was bad.

          To their credit, they did issue a retraction and repost the story with correct steps.

          The copyright strikes were definitely a dumb way to handle it.

          Idk if true or not but in an Arstechnica story, The Verge’s editor in chief apparently asked the Vox lawyers to rescind the copyright strikes.

          I don’t mean to sound like I’m defending them. The video should never have made it up in the first place, but people make mistakes. If you own it and apologize, I’ll give you a second chance.

          I don’t always agree with their take on a topic, but for the most part I have found them to be factual.

          I do also agree with many Ed Zitron takes about them tho. They could be doing a better job on AI, but over the last few weeks I’ve seen an improvement there.

          TLDR: that PC build from 8 years ago was dumb and extra embarrassing, they should feel bad for it, but I still think some if the hate they get is unjustified.

    • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thanks, this is very helpful!

      It’s only allowing me report apps I’ve installed so I’m wondering if I should very briefly install the app to allow that. I’m generally cautions of allowing dodgy apps on my devices.

      • HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        You don’t have to open it. Therefore not being able to grant it permissions to access info.

        *I mean that theoretically but it’s worth a shot.we can also review bomb it on the App Store.

      • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I wouldn’t even download apps you don’t feel comfortable with because the permissions they are granted are agreed-upon at the time of download and you are also boosting the download and usage metrics simply by installing it and opening it once.

        It’s also extremely unlikely that an application such as X could ever be reported enough to have anything happen. I’m sure it’s on a manually approved list

        • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Yes, I feel the same way you do. I really don’t want to add to the download metrics. I’m making an exception this time. Some good journalists, for example Richard Chambers (Ireland), have downloaded it to test and debunk claims made by Musk about safeguards. I think their contribution was a net positive. So there are cases where it’s worth doing.

          I did not need to open the app once. Just downloading it allowed me to complain to apple using the link above. I feel when it comes to a CSAM factory such as this (possibly even trained on CSAM material), and with EU headquarters in my country (Ireland), I have to report it so Apple cannot claim ignorance. Who knows, maybe a whistleblower will someday tell us how many reports there were. Unfortunately our leaders are not leading on this issue, so the social contract is broken and we should all (IMO) do much more than posting on social media. My personal discomfort is less important.