• lumen@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Filming in public is not a form of violence in and of itself. Have you ever noticed that the public is called “public”, which is the opposite of “private”?

    • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      sharing that information with facebook is the violence. i don’t care if you take a photo and print it out to have it in a photo album. i care when i am in a big tech database, or even worse, an intelligence agency database. not that the two are very separate.

      • lumen@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        21 hours ago

        That’s a twisted view on the definition of violence… Anyhow, how would you distinguish between people filming for journalistic purposes, people filming and sending it to Meta, and people filming for other reasons? How would you decide who deserves your violence?

        • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          if i feel uncomfortable being filmed i will make myself heard, first nonviolently, then maybe with a bit of physical pressure. if I don’t even get to know when i am being filmed that’s intensely devious.

          • lumen@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            21 hours ago

            You can’t force people to act on you’re subjective feeling of being uncomfortable. Can’t.

                • Techno-rat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  Yes…………

                  Notice the ‘should’ in there?

                  That word implys that he is talking about a moral prerogative and not a judicial matter…

                  Which of course means its unenforceable. You’re missing the point entirely if you think that even needs to be brought up.

                  Him: “People Ought to // ought not to do this behaviour”

                  Your: “Cant Force them hahahaha pwned 😎"

                  Maybe just take a second to think about the implications of what you’re reading instead of embarrassing yourself like this going autocomplete mode and writing irrelevant ass comments

                • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  Seems pretty enforcable to me. Hell, they were even able to compel the U.S. Olympic committee to pay out hundreds of millions when their lead team doctor sexually harassed so many athletes that he’ll be in prison for the rest of his life.