Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-24 days agoHow possibly?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square217linkfedilinkarrow-up1775arrow-down1186
arrow-up1589arrow-down1imageHow possibly?lemmy.worldChippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-24 days agomessage-square217linkfedilink
minus-squareWren@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoI’d never heard it before and I understood the implication before they expanded on it. I’m a woman and a feminist who thinks the term toxic masculinity is unsuitable.
minus-squareemmy67@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoThat may be. I’m just suggesting pseudo masculinity is worse because it’s already confused.
minus-squareWren@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoBut so is toxic masculinity. It’s used to describe men being assholes because they’re men, and not because they just happen to be assholes, too.
minus-squareemmy67@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 hour agoHey, sure. I’m not arguing for the term toxic masculinity. I’m arguing against pseudo masculinity because it’s way more confusing. It’s probably better to find another term entirely
I’d never heard it before and I understood the implication before they expanded on it. I’m a woman and a feminist who thinks the term toxic masculinity is unsuitable.
That may be. I’m just suggesting pseudo masculinity is worse because it’s already confused.
But so is toxic masculinity. It’s used to describe men being assholes because they’re men, and not because they just happen to be assholes, too.
Hey, sure. I’m not arguing for the term toxic masculinity. I’m arguing against pseudo masculinity because it’s way more confusing.
It’s probably better to find another term entirely