• dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was gonna say. This idea has been floating around for decades.

      Bottom line: Yes it will work. It will also involve transporting nuclear warheads to another country, which probably violates all kinds of treaties and will set governments everywhere into a panic of epic proportions. The knock-on effects of nuclear contamination will be a problem for the local population, local water table, and local ocean currents. You can bet your bottom-dollar that these, and possibly more, problems will be shouldered solely by the soon-to-be-god-forsaken masses of whatever country eventually okays this idea.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Well, modern nukes aren’t as bad for contamination as the originals, since they only need enough fissile material to kick start the fusion reaction. The biggest issue is they don’t actually save you any time for the extravagant cost they add. You would still have to do manual construction and excavation along the whole length with the added complication of now having to deal with what contamination does still exist.

      • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        24 hours ago

        No need for transport, they’re already in a certain country known for refusing to sign the nonproliferation treaty