• Man_kind@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I personally dont think this is far fetched. There seems to have been a cover up about his death. The alleged shooter was maga. Kirk was going against Israel, and could have been a significant problem and priority target for israel, but for anyone else, he was just a racist POS, and very low significance, if someone wished to assassinate with goals of slowing maga down.

    However, he was probably quite relevant for young people, so I could see it going either way, but I dont find the theory Israel was responsible is too much of a stretch, and it appears powerful people didnt want the public to learn too much about it.

    • hector@lemmy.todayBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The official story is bullshit. He was NOT hit with a 30.06, that rifle would have blown a fist sized hole out the back of his neck. The shooter didn’t dissassmble the rifle in 1 minute flat into that little bag. Then they don’t find the rifle with dogs the sheriffs bring around, but the FBI finds it fully assembled right under the dog’s noses?

      That is wrong on at least three scores. They are lying to us, obviously, lending credence to the Israel angle.