• remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well, it would depend on how good the evidence for that classification is, but I find it quite hard to fathom how that could work out. How can they be a “human population” but than turn out not to be? Either they are humans or they aren’t. We have like taxonomic definitions backed up by DNA data for that.

    But trying to just run with it, I’d say if a population can pass as fellow humans and we only single them out because of a technicality, then I’d probably still consider them human, so I wouldn’t agree with the governments decision. Passing a IRL turing test has to count for something.

    • lalo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ok, now let’s equalize the trait that justifies the difference in treatment between cows and these beings: passing a turing test.

      Say these human-similes are mentally handicapped and have the intellect equivalent of a cow. Would you now verdit as guilty someone who artificially inseminated one of them without consent?

      • remon@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think it really depends on what these “human-similes” actually are. Are they just humans with maybe a genetic defect or people affected some environmental poison that causes neurological damage? In that case, they’re still clearly human in my opinion.

        Or are they basically dumb monkeys that just look similar to humans (which of course means, they never were human to begin with, so this no longer fit’s into the premise of the previous comment)?

        I don’t think that “intelligence” is that important of a factor when it comes to deciding which animals you can eat. It’s really about if they are human or not. Like, personally I wouldn’t eat the closely related monkeys, both, because I think they are kind of endangered and it feels a bit weird that they are so closely relate to us. But if there is a way to reasonably/legally eat monkey somewhere and people do it, I won’t condemn them too hard for it.

        • lalo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think it really depends on what these “human-similes” actually are.

          Would there be a difference if they were an alien species or a species related to us but not Homo sapiens, when either woud still feel and have a will to live?

          • remon@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Haha, I actually typed out a version of my comment with alien shapeshifters as a solution. And then it really depends on what their intentions are. Still, if you managed to fool humans into being humans, they’re obviously a species that is beyond just being livestock.