TheObviousSolution

I have no problem with security cameras either. Asshole like Elon make a car with cameras, and suddenly the GDPR doesn’t apply and judges switch to issuing subpoenas to their owners in case they might have caught a nearby crime instead of issuing fines.

Having some decent surveillance that you aren’t an asshole with (hint: if you are using to track and profile people and you are the sort of person who likes to doxx, you probably are) brings ease of mind. You no longer have to suppose who or when some crime might have been committed, and even if it’s not useful for catching them they can effectively help you make your prevention more effective. If governments cared about our security, they would just make sure they had no backdoors or mass surveillance capabilities, they would at least allow for personal, localized usage for our property a lot more.

Didn’t know about the term sousveillance, that’s awesome because that’s what I’ve been arguing for all along.

Basically poisoning the well for augmented reality glasses.

You know why.

BBS or nothing.

The Home Office’s failure to inform asylum applicants that AI tools are being used in their assessments is likely to be unlawful, according to a legal opinion, published today.

Not nearly as positive.

I naturally assume there’s a distinct lack of humanity and a willingness to act like a psychopath with them.

You never go full ChatGPT.

I mean, if this is the way the average CEO is handling ChatGPT, a lot of things start to make sense.