This seems to imply that you just replace all fossil fuel energy sources with batteries which does not even make sense. Once the batteries have been discharged, how would you recharge them?
What should actually be done is scale up renewable power generation and then you’d use the batteries to balance out the difference between production and consumption, which takes a lot less batteries than trying to replace energy generation with energy storage (which, again, would not even work).
NMC cells typically operate around 1-2C and LFP cells 1-3C. If you want to achieve 10C then you’re probably gonna have to look at LTO cells. All of these are lithium-ion chemistries but they each have different characteristics.
I’m not in the list either, this is bullshit.
The party is using this money to push their reach hard. It’s hard to use social media in Sweden without coming across clips of Markus Allard doing an “epic takedown” of another local politician or ranting with righteous fury against some waste of taxpayer money and the message is resonating with a lot of voters, for a lot of them the Örebro Party just seems like the “common sense” choice. There is a strong possibility that they will make it into parliament at this fall’s election and they would not have been able to have this reach without this funding.
But cycle life is a central parameter for the cost of a battery, the longer it lasts the more rarely you have to replace it. In the longer term, a battery that lasts twice as long can be practically half as expensive.
In theory, as long as there is nothing ferromagnetic inside what you put into the center of the coil, there shouldn’t be anything happening at all, harmful or otherwise.
That being said, please don’t stick bodyparts inside workshop tools.