Sure, there is a usecase for this. But sperate buffers and varying (and often unintuitive) behavior of software and which buffer is used how is a much bigger hurdle for people not used to it than that “middle-click pasting is confusing” bullshit…

No, what actually makes sense is a proper unification of different copy/paste buffers that is nowadays still mostly improvised and only achieved through very different 3rd party tools (for me using the panel from xfce it’s xfce4-clipman for example that keeps highlighting text and middle-click buffers synchronised with ctrl-c/ctrl-v or ctrl-insert/shift-insert…).

The problem is not accidently pasting something with a middle-click, but not knowing what is in one buffer, what is in another one and which one a program is using.

Your browser should normally handle that.

But you can also replace that string with ‘+’: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_(Ctrl+Alt+Del)

I don’t quite get why Gnome people see this as a negative.

Because GNOME decisions are correct, always and exclusively so. Everyone who disagrees is obviously clueless and can be disregarded.

That’s basically the GNOME mantra.

GNOME guys complaining about someone trying to force unilateral decisions upon them and being totally uncoopertaive must be satire…