MotoAsh

This isn’t a SocDem problem but a Democratic Establishment problem.

The DNC are the absolute shitstains standing in the way of progress while pretending to be progressive. Just remember how they royally fucked Bernie over in 2016 because it was, “Her Turn”™.

That was when many people gave up on Democrats, and rightfully so if it wasn’t for Trump running in 2024.

Keep proudly throwing around that ignorance while people are explaining how you are wrong to your face…

It’s not flattering.

The user never sees dependencies … until they do.

Go ahead and try to use different Python products that require different versions yet don’t use a venv.

Similarly, there is a reason average users hated Java even while it was heavily adopted for back ends.

They care if the thing you just described, potential interference with normal operation, happens!

Yes, exactly. Like exactly what happens when external dependencies conflict.

Again, you are yet again projecting your personal ignorance and preference on everyone. I’m “insulting” you because you are using an assinine avenue of thought.

lol your ability to shit out words and demonstrate how deep your assumptions are is … hilarious.

The overhead on storage is hardly of consequence, especially for corporations. Otherwise even windows apps wouldn’t bundle so many dll’s next to the exe’s.

It’s not always about security. In larger deployed environments, even dependencies among the corporation’s own apps that they develop, let alone all apps they might need to use, might have different versions of dependencies to use. They might work with entirely different languages and frameworks.

Instead of loading up raw servers or VM’s with twenty external dependencies of potentially varying versions, which would quickly become a nightmare to administer, they just ship containers. Each app can do what ever the hell the team wants with what ever the hell versions of dependencies they want. It quickly becomes very important for ease of IT administration to just have little black boxes that have their defined ins and outs.

It’s usually much less important for an individual’s personally used computer, but it should still be easily understandable that some people do not like having to install several dependencies for one app (even when the package manager handles it 99% of the time these days). Especially if those dependencies create a lot of files here and there, or potentially interfere with other things installed. Maybe it’s as simple as an app they like requires Java 11, and they don’t want to install it across the entire OS.

Again, you’d have to be an absolute idiot to fail to realize that these problems and wants do exist for others.

If it’s only rarely, it might just be some dumb caching issue, or it can be a build ordering issue. Like you have to be careful in Rollup configs or some tasks will mangle the code before a sourcemap is generated. Otherwise iirc it may have to be turned on in browser settings, though hopefully they’re on by default these days.

Yep, just full-throatedly out here yelling how you don’t understand the problems being addresed…

OFC somene who favors macos doesn’t understand dependency hell or general IT frustrations…

There’s a reason containers and immutable/atomic linux flavors have become popular… In fact, several. Good ones.

Not sure if using the official package repos should count as a “workaround”…

Source maps are friends.

They would point to the right lines if source maps were included in the build.

Anecdotes to not disprove norms.

Huh, well, sucks for them if they did know more. Really sucks for them if they didn’t.

lol No. Racists will hate a race over zero examples. Then when one person does one bad thing, it’s a whole new round of, “yep, can’t expect much out of those [insert racist and demeaning term here].”

Wage workers that turn in justice fighters. (yes I know, not all mcd’s workers/etc/etc. I mostly support boycotting mcd’s because it’s expensive trash that enriches a megacorp, not over Luigi)

Through a natural push towards the adult version of anarchy. I don’t think all of the ideas wrestled with in Marxism-Leninism are wrong or off base, I just think it’s assinine to call something that still has demonstrably separated and elevated rulers “communism” or particularly great.

Just like a lot of outright socialists don’t necessarily like to be directly mixed in with democratic socialists, I think the communists who do not make a distinction for the very much not communist parts of Marxism-Leninism are only serving a gross lack of nuance and doing a disservice to a huge part of the goals of communism.

Yea, because a ruling class that’s pushing a lot of development still exists. Along with capitalists pushing investment around. Two things communism doesn’t want around. Things are happening, but they’re happenstantial, just like capitalism’s claims to fame.

At least things are going decent-ish in China for what the ruling class is pushing. Russia isn’t exactly faring so well…

I’m not against communism. I’m just against claiming Marxism-Leninism is a demonstrably good version of it.

That is absolutely not how it functions in reality.

The part where Marxism-Lenninism is a dogshit trash version of “communism” that still asks for a ruling party, making it demonstrably self-defeating from the standpoint of actually attaining communism.

I give it a week.