What would be better though?
I have my problems with mozilla, but between apple, google and mozilla, they absolutely win in my book.

a real life example? you mean like a photo of a person next to a router?

they never specified it to be scientific or rigorous.

This could have been amazing if integrated into a district heating network.

this sends a clear message though. No the old “just hook them, then we have guaranteed income forever” isn’t actually working. That’s great.

but only if the platform is sufficiently large

hm, that sounds sensible actually

I disagree, lots of things are much cheaper and worse.

Clothes are much cheaper and far worse. Power tools are generally a lot cheaper bit also built to break.

Houses are somehow more expensive AND lower quality though.

I’m pretty happy with my samsung. No really, hear me out, if power cuts out, when it resumes, the tv auto starts on the same input.

I have it connected to a pc, and use a smart plug for turning on and off. Haven’t seen a trace of the smarts for years :D

One could say he did the wrong thing for the right reasons

does dry running have any meaning on a function that is inherently stochastic?

Google controls search results and has been caught meddling. Which negates the first two.

No it doesn’t negate the forst two. It only addresses the second, and bypassing the results completely, exascerbates the problem quite a bit.

Cry me a river.

great argument.

• It helps spread false information widely

• It puts a lot of control of information in a single companies hands

• It hurts the underlying sources

When google provides the info directly, and the first hand sources has become completely obsolete and shut down, what would new information stem from? It’s an inherently unstable and short sighted solution.

this is problematic on multiple levels.

the face is switched yeah, that’s what I am referring to

You sure? this would be quite simple to whip up in photoshop

ground water is a completely different beast. This device harvests moisture from the air.

It’s easy to crush the competition when you purposely take a loss as an investment in future market share.

Those are illegal in most places, just fyi

yes???

you can but then it’s not “British spelling”