• hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Truly as far as I know there is no case law for this to date.

    I thought about this for a while but I have no clue what the current direction is.

    Essentially stealing data and putting them in datasets is illegal. AI models might be illegal, if the court considers them legally functionally the same. But if they don’t, they could meet any number of new legal definitions and that gets us back to “idk”. What is funny is because you would technically do the same copyright infringement that the AI companies do (if it gets ruled that way), these companies are essentially arguing for you, and so you could ride on the coat tails of corpo lawyers.

    But yeah, it’s complicated.

    • Zarobi@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Lawmakers are still reeling from the invention of the internet, they have no hope of deciding how A.I. should work within the next decade

      • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not only this, I am increasingly under the impression the abrupt change of direction under trump has a paralyzing effect on all branches of government. And it’s good when they use this time to isolate his policies from most of the country. But it’s bad when our legal branch stops doing lots of normal law things.