• CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Who benefits from the government buying 50% overvalued shares? And when these companies inevitably fail, why should half the cost be soialized?

        • kurwa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          It’s not buying it, it’s seizing it. That’s means taking by force, you don’t pay for that. Try reading.

            • kurwa@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              It wouldn’t even happen under the current government. Republicans and liberals are too afraid of what they call government overreach.

              Bernie isn’t a capitalist, I think y’all are wayyyy overthinking this one lol

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    16 hours ago

                    How does social democracy affirm capitalism over socialism? By maintaining private ownership of the means of production without transitioning to a dictatorship of the proletariat. How is Bernie a social democrat? By holding to reform over revolution, and siding with the US over overthrowing it.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Taking back half of their stolen profits seems like a step in the good direction though. Let’s seize their assets, starting with the half here, and then close them down.

        • dev_null@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          He wants to take over 50% of the companies without paying them. If that’s not seizing then I don’t know what is.

          Edit: If the downvoters want to tell me where I’m wrong, I’d be glad to be corrected.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            32 minutes ago

            Edit: If the downvoters want to tell me where I’m wrong, I’d be glad to be corrected.

            Fifth amendment to the constitution states: “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation” meaning this proposition is straight up unconstitutional unless they amend it to pay. And i assume Bernie do know constitution of his own country so i have no clue how he proposed it like this unless it is to stir a shitstorm about “seizing” and then amend it as “compromise”.