KatherinaReichelt@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoBrowsers Treat Big Sites Differentlydenodell.comexternal-linkmessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up1165arrow-down15
arrow-up1160arrow-down1external-linkBrowsers Treat Big Sites Differentlydenodell.comKatherinaReichelt@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square28linkfedilink
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoA standard is that, a standard. The amount of moving parts (features?) is irrelevant. Either it’s up to the standard or it isn’t.
minus-squaregroet@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 days agoThen no browser will be “up to” the last 15 years of the standard as none implement all features.
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoCorrect. That is why we’re talking about having standards and enforcing them. That’s the whole point.
minus-squaregroet@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoNo the point of this discussion is about having one single yes/no question about the standard or a list of features.
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoSo, we’re speaking different languages. Got it.
A standard is that, a standard. The amount of moving parts (features?) is irrelevant.
Either it’s up to the standard or it isn’t.
Then no browser will be “up to” the last 15 years of the standard as none implement all features.
Correct. That is why we’re talking about having standards and enforcing them. That’s the whole point.
No the point of this discussion is about having one single yes/no question about the standard or a list of features.
So, we’re speaking different languages. Got it.