• HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The core point is: The printer runs FOSS software with a GPL license, but the company has modified it with the purpose to tie it to their own cloud service (like these HP inkjet printers for example).

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s not strictly accurate.

      The slicer is Open Source yes, but not the printer firmware or software. That’s closed source and proprietary to Bambu.

      Now there’s some contention there because a lot of the features and ideas that make modern 3D printing as reliable and great were developed in the open, under open source licenses and Bambu has definitely implemented many of them in their printer firmware, but they don’t infringe any licenses in the printer software itself (as far as anyone is aware).

      This whole debacle centres around the slicing software, which is separate from the printer itself (though is necessary to actually use the printer) and it’s AGPL.

      • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The slicer is Open Source yes, but not the printer firmware or software.

        The firmware is not unlikely to be linux-based. And hardware drivers for Linux are part of the kernel which is under GPL license.

        • Kushan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          If that’s the case, then it should be trivial to prove and the EFF can force them to open source it.

          Let’s not make baseless accusations, let’s get proof and hold them to it.