• eightys3v3n@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I was worried enough about buying a used car in five years, thanks. Nov I have to worry about having the shit infotainment systems that were disappearing on top of having to pay a subscription to release my parking breaks??

  • smeg@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    Rent seeking behavior. They want subscription revenue instead of wanting to deliver what consumers want.

    • earthworm@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      For the most part, it’s believed that carmakers are doing way with Android Auto support simply as a way to expand their control over user data. Because Android Auto utilizes your phone’s connection, all of the data that runs through it goes straight to Android and the phone manufacturer. So, by utilizing built-in systems, the car manufacturers would indeed be able to collect more data about how you use the systems in place, while also possibly getting more money out of you through subscriptions.

      You are unfortunately correct.

  • dangercake@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Removing smartphone integration from its vehicles opens the door for GM to grow its in-vehicle subscription revenue. Yep 💩

  • haywire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Back to the days of rip out the head unit and stick one in that does have the features you want?

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’ll use a 3rd party auxiliary screen for Android Auto if this ends up proliferating to other brands as a grab for subscriptions.

  • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    I wish I could develop my own apps on my own car. I mean I own the car… why can’t I “sideload” my own created apps? Their apps are sht anyways.

    • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      It kind of makes sense to not allow people to do that - just imagine what horrors people will create that totally will kill people. Cars are dangerous.

        • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          There are two things hidden here:

          1. People totally got killed by doing their own maintenance
          2. There is a difference between physical maintenance and, well, you know that people will install some buggy self driving app
          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            the entertainment system should have zero access to anything that controls the movement of the car. androidauto apps can’t implement self driving functions either. if it’s possible, the car manufacturer was incredibly irresponsible and needs to be sued into oblivion. see, the actual problem is not that irresponsible users could implement “self driving apps”, but that the entertainment system lacks any real security, is filled with vulnerabilities, and often even have remote access capabilities with bluetooth/wifi/cellular, and bad actors could load malware wirelessly that would kill the passengers and whoever else on the road.

    • Cloudstash@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yes, blame automotive business that you arent able to aquire a new car free, that falls in line with todays snowflake mentality.