What makes you think this? Server costs have gone up, Bitwarden has increased their pricing. It’s a big jump, but it’s also still very very affordable (less than $2/mo). How is this indicative of them changing behavior in the future to start trying to take down legally licensed open source projects like Vaultwarden?
I just picked up a NitroKey to have as a backup too but like others have said its open source. Its nice to use the official client now but if there’s demand I’m sure an alternative will be implemented.
Selfhost.Vaultwarden.
Boy am I glad I self hosted … but sadly this means they’ll likely put a stop to that too eventually
vaultwarden != bitwarden. VW is a complete rewrite. they can’t stop vaultwarden.
What makes you think this? Server costs have gone up, Bitwarden has increased their pricing. It’s a big jump, but it’s also still very very affordable (less than $2/mo). How is this indicative of them changing behavior in the future to start trying to take down legally licensed open source projects like Vaultwarden?
It’s open source, there will be forks. I’m not worried at all.
I just picked up a NitroKey to have as a backup too but like others have said its open source. Its nice to use the official client now but if there’s demand I’m sure an alternative will be implemented.