themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoReFS is better than NTFS, but Microsoft refuses to let regular users have itwww.xda-developers.comexternal-linkmessage-square23linkfedilinkarrow-up184arrow-down113
arrow-up171arrow-down1external-linkReFS is better than NTFS, but Microsoft refuses to let regular users have itwww.xda-developers.comthemachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square23linkfedilink
minus-squareundefined@lemmy.hogru.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 days agoRight? I’ve gone through ReiserFS, ext3, ext4, XFS, Btrfs, ZFS; hell on macOS I’ve been through HFS+ and AFS. And clunky ol’ Microsoft is still on fucking NTFS.
minus-squareAppoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·1 day agoWhy change it if it works? What is so bad about NTFS?
minus-squareundefined@lemmy.hogru.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 hours agoWhy use NTFS if FAT32 works?
Right? I’ve gone through ReiserFS, ext3, ext4, XFS, Btrfs, ZFS; hell on macOS I’ve been through HFS+ and AFS. And clunky ol’ Microsoft is still on fucking NTFS.
Why change it if it works?
What is so bad about NTFS?
Why use NTFS if FAT32 works?
Because 4GB file limit?