Fork time? Maybe all the anti-systemd zealots were right all along…

Edit: To address whether it is likely that this change will affect users: Gnome is planning a stronger dependence on userdb, the part of systemd where this change is being implemented. https://blogs.gnome.org/adrianvovk/2025/06/10/gnome-systemd-dependencies/

Final Edit: The PR has been merged into main.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    You mean tied to IDs or something?

    Commercial services would’ve just implemented that anyway. And yeah, likely with “absolute bare minimum effort.”

    I’m still a bit confused. This thread is acting like this is a slope to systemd distros requiring an ID check, if I’m reading it right.

    • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yes it’s rage bait and most here fall face first in it.
      Go petition your lawmakers instead of shitting on open source projects implementing required by law features.

        • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Then incite people to call their legislators. Not openly shit on maintainers of open source projects.
          I see more people here whining about systemd than about having the laws repealed. It’s simple: there are currently 0 posts about that.

    • Hugging Stars@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You mean tied to IDs or something?

      Anything goes, ID is one way to do it.

      This thread is acting like this is a slope to systemd distros requiring an ID check, if I’m reading it right.

      The post itself is phrased like that for engagement.