• XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Your comments now are a huge shift from

    “That sounds like problematic use,” the Instagram boss answered. He did not call it an addiction.

    He also didn’t say it was a tomato.

    Seems that, in the interest of accuracy, you should update them, lest you be the thing you claim others are.

    • Analog@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I recommend a re-read, my good buddy, of all my posts in this thread.

      Truth. Not lies. Not conjecture.

      This can be the truth that he was dodging the question.

      Don’t say people said things they didn’t say. Simple.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Your original post was a lie, or dumb accident, through omission. And now that you know better, you are lying intentionally in it.

        You know damn well they were talking about addiction and not tomatoes. And yet you dishonestly tell people those two things are the same.

        • Analog@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Did the douchebag say exactly what the post title said he said?

          • XLE@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            Have you walked back your lie comparing the actual topic of addiction to the irrelevant topic of tomatoes? Make sure you post an explicit correction along with an apology.

            “If the truth isn’t enough, I don’t want it.” Please demonstrate.

            • Analog@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              18 hours ago

              You support lying. Good to know.

              If you don’t understand the tomato comment, no wonder you’re having so much trouble with the interpretation and lying topics!

              • XLE@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                There’s no way you can say that the inquiry was about tomatoes as much as it was about addiction. Not without being incredibly stupid or incredibly dishonest.

                You are now intentionally leaving out multiple paragraphs of content that would prove the opposite, which adds to your deception.

                Demonstrate a grain of honesty by fixing your lies and maybe you’ll have a right to talk.

                • Analog@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  You really don’t understand and are just driving the point home the more you post. I feel kinda sorry for you.

                  • XLE@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 hours ago

                    Please defend your use of your lying false equivalency. Demonstrate your wisdom, Truth Seeker.