Zerush@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 day agoProduct improved by AIlemmy.mlimagemessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up1453arrow-down17
arrow-up1446arrow-down1imageProduct improved by AIlemmy.mlZerush@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 day agomessage-square29linkfedilink
minus-squareLe_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoyou’re misunderstanding the analogy. this is a fundamental problem with analogies.
minus-squareVampire [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 hours ago‘fundamental’ would mean it applies to good analogies, not just wrong ones
minus-squareLe_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 hours agoit does. an analogy is not 1:1 and if it was it wouldn’t be an analogy, it would just be the thing.
minus-squareVampire [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoThat’s getting a bit too vague for me. How is giving people a chatbot like giving paraplegics pedals? Nobody has explained it yet.
minus-squareZerush@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoI understand that adding an chatbot to an product don’t make it more practical, when you find even a Toaster with AI. Also an design made with ChatGPT insteatof research can also result in an absurd crap, halucinating not only in chats.
you’re misunderstanding the analogy. this is a fundamental problem with analogies.
‘fundamental’ would mean it applies to good analogies, not just wrong ones
it does. an analogy is not 1:1 and if it was it wouldn’t be an analogy, it would just be the thing.
That’s getting a bit too vague for me.
How is giving people a chatbot like giving paraplegics pedals? Nobody has explained it yet.
I understand that adding an chatbot to an product don’t make it more practical, when you find even a Toaster with AI. Also an design made with ChatGPT insteatof research can also result in an absurd crap, halucinating not only in chats.