Some_Emo_Chick@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoDiscord Is Bringing Back Age Verification for Millions of Userswww.gadgetreview.comexternal-linkmessage-square174linkfedilinkarrow-up1540arrow-down117
arrow-up1523arrow-down1external-linkDiscord Is Bringing Back Age Verification for Millions of Userswww.gadgetreview.comSome_Emo_Chick@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square174linkfedilink
minus-squarepycorax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up145·4 days ago The selfie method stands out: on-device processing with no video retained is a meaningful privacy distinction. Yea I don’t buy it
minus-squareBrennenstein@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up60·4 days ago Yea I don’t buy it Good. No one should. Not at least after the data breach. I ain’t giving them shit.
minus-squarematt1126@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·4 days agoThat quote from the article also sounds like AI wrote that bit.
minus-squarethanksforallthefish@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·4 days agoThe whole article was AI written, the headings the “voice” scream AI
minus-squarecriss_cross@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoIt 100% is. That’s a Claude-ism if I ever saw one. I read too much AI slop for a living to know.
minus-squareCethin@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoYeah, this just means, if true, it’s totally ineffective. It’ll be hacked to bypass it if it’s all local, which means people wanting to avoid it will.
Yea I don’t buy it
Good. No one should. Not at least after the data breach. I ain’t giving them shit.
That quote from the article also sounds like AI wrote that bit.
The whole article was AI written, the headings the “voice” scream AI
It 100% is. That’s a Claude-ism if I ever saw one.
I read too much AI slop for a living to know.
Yeah, this just means, if true, it’s totally ineffective. It’ll be hacked to bypass it if it’s all local, which means people wanting to avoid it will.