Even if you think you are right, o arbiter of truth, apparently dozens of people disagree with your take when shown context. That’s on you bro. Go fix it.
You’re out here swinging on a straw man if you can’t restate what you think my position is, and have it be remotely accurate. Which, so far, you’re not even close.
Did I summarize your position well enough? Any clarifications?
Even if you think you are right, o arbiter of truth, apparently dozens of people disagree with your take when shown context. That’s on you bro. Go fix it.
lol you missed the duplicate the first time, yet another sign of your illiteracy. And you ignored it, typical of the belligerent hypocrite… But tell us, o wise one, what “authority” do you feel was appealed to?
How can you be arguing with someone and not even know what their position is? No, none of your prior posts come close.
Naw, screw “know” - you’re fucking clueless. You have no idea and are screaming into the wind.
Even if you think you are right, o arbiter of truth, apparently dozens of people disagree with your take when shown context. That’s on you bro. Go fix it.
You’re out here swinging on a straw man if you can’t restate what you think my position is, and have it be remotely accurate. Which, so far, you’re not even close.
Did I summarize your position well enough? Any clarifications?
Wrong.
Even if you think you are right, o arbiter of truth, apparently dozens of people disagree with your take when shown context. That’s on you bro. Go fix it.
lol @ copy and paste. You’re committing a second logical fallacy: appeal to authority.
Still so wrong “bro”
lol you missed the duplicate the first time, yet another sign of your illiteracy. And you ignored it, typical of the belligerent hypocrite… But tell us, o wise one, what “authority” do you feel was appealed to?